Above is a link to an interesting article from the Globe & Mail detailing the debate surrounding the choice of letters designating a Canadian law degree.
I am personally very happy that I will have both a traditional Canadian LL.B. and a U.S. J.D. but I can understand some of the concerns of my LL.B. colleagues.
One suggestion I would add is that all Canadian schools should treat law school as a full professional, post-graduate degree program. This would also mean students entering law school must have a full 4 year undergraduate degree. There really is no reason law students should be considered undergraduates while our M.B.A. counterparts are full graduate students.
Anyhow, that's my 2 cents.
Within the article, there is a short 2 grafs on the program:
RWA twist in the tale, however, is that not all JD degrees granted by Canadian law schools are the same. Some schools, such as the University of Windsor Law School and that of the University of Calgary, also grant U.S. JD degrees in conjunction with universities south of the border. That degree is recognized by the American Bar Association, while purely Canadian JDs are not.
"Because of our proximity to the United States, we have a combined LLB and U.S. JD degree," says U of Windsor Law School dean Bruce Elman. "Our JD is recognized by the ABA and lets graduates practise in the U.S., while the LLB lets them practice in Canada."
